If you were a) jacked up, b) held at gunpoint, or c) politely asked to hand over your firearm as you a) left town, b) went about your business or c) tried to help your neighbors in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, you might be eligible to get your illegally confiscated gun back if you follow the rules established by the court. According to the terms of the permanent injunction against the city, issued in October 2008, the city has to “make an aggressive attempt to return any and all firearms which may have been confiscated during the period August 29 to December 31, 2005.” You can access the information at the city’s webpage. Scroll to the bottom of the page on the right hand side and click the little red box that reads “Hurricane Katrina Firearms.”
According to Assistant City Attorney Victor L. Papai, as of last October only three applicants had turned in paperwork to get their guns back. Papai does not return calls any longer regarding the tally. The city does not have their guns and it only has to comply with the court order until October 2010.
Local tavern owner JoAnn Guidos is one of those applicants. She owns Kajun’s Pub on St. Claude Avenue and boasts that her establishment “never closes” and that people feel safe there because they know that Guidos knows how to use firearms. During the aftermath of Katrina, she kept the pub open for two weeks, running generators and serving ice-cold beer and hot grilled food to the neighborhood, press and visiting law enforcement. Meanwhile, around her, shooters and looters, along with law enforcement, used St. Claude Avenue as the only highway to and from the Lower 9th Ward.
She said, “I didn’t want to evacuate because I didn’t want people to break in and destroy this place. And that’s what happened. They were breaking into houses and then, setting them on fire.” She recalled, “We had firemen and policemen from all over the country here and I told them I was armed and that this was a safe house and they didn’t do nothing. They had no problem. Then, the U.S. Marshals came walking down the street.”
On September 8, 2008, Guidos and friends decided to leave New Orleans. Things had quieted down with the arrival of federal troops, but heat and humidity stayed high. So, since there was no power restored yet to her building, she decided it would be safe to lock the bar and head to Mississippi. While loading the van in front of the bar, she carried her Browning 12-gauge semi-automatic shotgun and wore a .38 in her belt. Five U.S. Marshals came driving down St. Claude and stopped half a block away from the pub. They got out of their vehicle and came running toward Guidos and crew with M-16s, yelling “Put the guns down!” Guidos said, “They went right after me. They said to put my hands on the car and then, asked if I had any other guns.” She gave them her other guns and asked for a receipt. They never showed any ID, and they never gave her a receipt.
The scenario gets complicated because one of Guidos’ employees, unbeknownst to her at the time, is a convicted felon and she had loaned him a .25 semi-auto to wear. When the Feds ran the ID checks, they discovered this fact and cuffed the employee and took him away. However, Guidos said the employee only had one of her guns on him, and reiterated, she carried two of them and had packed two of them in the van. The charges against her employee were dismissed in July 2006, in the U.S. District Court Eastern District of Louisiana.
On November 12, 2008, Guidos filed paperwork to get her five guns back and hand-delivered it to a sergeant at a police station on Earhart in New Orleans. By January 2009, when she had not heard anything, she contacted Holliday. He contacted Papai, who told Holliday that he [Papai] already had contacted Guidos by phone and by letter. Holliday then sent Guidos a copy of the letter that Papai claimed to have sent her, dated Oct. 24, 2008 – supposedly written to her three weeks before she turned in her claims. Guidos said, “I found it rather odd that the letter they sent to me in response to my forms was written a month before I turned in my forms.” She says he never called her.
Futhermore, she believes she is caught between two systems: the local police department and the federal law enforcement system. She continued, “This is the question I put to Dan and nobody can give me an answer: Where are my damn guns?
“My weapons were taken by the U.S. Marshals, and supposedly they were in federal custody and I was verbally told that the Feds transferred the weapons to New Orleans, but I cannot find out who transferred them and who received them. … There’s paperwork there somewhere that someone signed for. If I can get a copy of the transfer order, than I can at least either get my weapons back and/or the value back of the weapons [value approx. ,000].”
When asked about Guidos’ predicament, Holliday responded: “I don’t have any information regarding Guidos. Because her situation inv
When asked about Guidos’ predicament, Holliday responded: “I don’t have any information regarding Guidos. Because her situation involved a gun seized as evidence it does not fall under our consent judgment, even now that the charges were dismissed.”
Lessons learned? Read on..
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=36441
Something similar happened to me once. I was arrested for unlawfully carying a weapon because I had a sword in my car that was laying right on top of the renaisance fair costume it was a part of. The cop searched my car and took my bowie knife from the trunk. It took 18 months to get a court date and prove that I had not committed a crime as in texas swords and knives used in historical recreations or ceremonies are not subject to unlawful carry laws. After the verdict the judge ordered the prosecutor to give my weapons back. But my bowie knife a gift from my father on my 12th birthday was missing. I went back and forth between the state, the county and the DA and no one could tell me where my knife was. So I went to the county constable’s office and filed theft charges against the arresting officer. My knife was returned the next day.
When the government takes your property unlawfully it is theft. Treat them like any other thief.
absence of knowledge does not exempt a person from the law.
Otherwise you would be exempt from them all.
Supplying firearms to a convicted felon is a crime.
She should have shot it out with those gestapo creeps.
Those citizens were STUPID for handing them over in the first place !!!!!
If people were walking up the street in my neighborhood and people were yelling "they’re coming to take our guns", I think that situation would be over VERY QUICKLY….
YES, I would fire on "law enforcement" if they tried to take my arms. Let’s be very clear on that. That is something NO police officer or enlisted man should ever consider doing to ANY American. If they do…. then what happens, happens.
thank god we passed a law in michigan where that cant happen to us ,it is a crime these people had their civil rights violated
Her guns were probably lost in the shuffle. Federal agents often believe they can do whatever they want, but even if not, there was a lot going on in New Orleans in the Katrina aftermath.
This is what happens when you have mass hysteria. Only the idiots in our government would take guns DURING a major crisis, when law-abiding citizens would need them the most.
It sure makes me want to have an unlicensed gun.
I wish JoAnn Guidos would have been suspicious and wary enough to have concealed those guns. Out of sight–out of mind. There are so many situations where it is just not the best to trust our government. The law-abiding citizens in Katrina learned this the hard way. It is a cryin’ shame that we have to distrust our own government so much.
Lessons Learned: Everything the government knows about you, it found out FROM YOU. You’d think a bar owner would have a little more savvy than to openly display firearms outside. That’s just attracting attention. What, she didn’t have a croker sack? As for loaning the ex-felon a pistol, I figure anyone who doesn’t have the foresight to provide himself with his own arms probably shouldn’t be carrying.
How in the hell does any government entity have the right to suspend the constitution?
What will stop Obama from confiscating firearms the day before he declares himself President For Life!
I do not own any guns, but if I did, they would have to kill me to take it away,
Those that chose to stay and then fire guns at the rescue helicopters ruined it for everyone else, impossible for a helicopter to try to rescue people in 90 mph sustained winds. so instead of having knowledge of this, some decided to get the chopped to rescue them even putting the pilots in harms way.never saw such ignorance in my life!!!!